Since I am not sure what exactly the market will "hate" next week or in the weeks to come; it seems to change by the day; I want to build up 'protection' (hedging) another way, and we'll use gold. Gold is more of a sentiment indicator than anything to do with fundamentals. During this market rebound the Gold ETF (GLD) has not really fallen much - that is not a good sign. Remember, gold is the ultimate Armaggedon trade and in the past an inflation hedge (although it appears black gold has taken that mantle since last fall). So with the "all clear" signal once again launched by CNBC ("it's all priced in") it seems curious that gold is not correcting. Frankly with all the paper money being printed off (and or proposed) along with my assumption of yet another stealing of your grandchildren's future (i.e. the '2nd stimulus plan' I believe will be coming around election time) I am surprised gold is not $1200-$1400 :)
Instead of the ETF I've used Kinross Gold (KGC) in the past and it has done well for us, so I am going back to the well. Since this is a "sentiment" trade (to me) if the market strengthens this trade should fail, and vice versa. After spiking north of $25 at the height of the bailout talks (that was just this past weekend and Monday folks - even though it feels eons ago), it has now retraced below $23 and we're adding it here in the the $22.80s. If it breaks down below $21.50 (or the Gold ETF breaks down) we'll most likely be out.
In this case I won't mind if this trade does not work because it should mean other things in our portfolio are. So while this is a "long" position technically, mentally I consider it a "short"/hedge. Note - I am not a gold bug, nor a gold expert and buying a gold miner instead of the metal straight up can always be an error. But directionally this will either provide a hedge during further downside or not work if the market rebounds. So we might be out of this in a few days, a week or it might be a few months.
I debated getting into Kinross at the end of June but didn't pull the trigger (down at $21) [Jun 26: Gold. Back from the Dead?] We threw what was left of the cash we raised today, that had not been applied to index shorts into this position, and created a 2% stake in Kinross Gold.
Related Articles
|
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »



This article has 18 comments:
- atotonilco
- 12 Comments
Jul 18 02:15 PM- Steve-O
- 1 Comment
My Website
Jul 18 02:21 PM- CT Programmer
- 102 Comments
Jul 18 05:14 PM- GMiki
- 221 Comments
Jul 18 05:18 PM- nvsnowbunny
- 2 Comments
Jul 18 05:20 PM- pooramerican
- 19 Comments
Jul 19 01:10 AM- bearfund
- 436 Comments
Jul 19 01:39 AM- CLH
- 461 Comments
Jul 19 09:06 AM- gigem77
- 99 Comments
Jul 19 09:31 AM- Mongoose
- 27 Comments
Jul 19 10:19 AM- notsosmart
- 884 Comments
My Website
Jul 19 11:25 AM- bowman711
- 99 Comments
Jul 19 12:18 PM"The Commitment of Traders report issue on Friday for positions held at the close of trading on Tuesday are as follows: Gold...the tech funds increased their net long position in the Non-Commercial category by 13,181 contracts. Opposite them, were the bullion banks...the '8 or less' traders...in the Commercial category. They increased their net short position by 17,917 contracts. The difference between these two numbers is the increase in the net long position by the small traders in the Nonreportable Positions category...so you can see that the bullion banks were going short against everyone who went long. Silver: There wasn't as much activity as I expected (was it all reported?). The tech funds went net long 1,147 contracts and the bullion banks went net short 2,595 contracts...once again the difference being the increase in net long positions of the small traders in the Nonreportable category."
Can gold go anyplace when every long contract is matched by a naked short?
- jock
- 16 Comments
Jul 19 12:39 PMEven Hank Paulson can't know that!
- notsosmart
- 884 Comments
My Website
Jul 19 01:24 PM- swaps
- 53 Comments
Jul 19 04:52 PMI take it the poster owns 2% of Kinross, and does not mean he has 2% of his money in Kinross, which would not be a strong hedge.
Kinross is 9% of my holdings, which has about 20 positions.
I also have AAUK, which has not fared as well, though my shares mostly go back a few years, and Gold Corp., which just issued an annual report that notes several of the veins they are currently working are of lesser quality. GG hasn't kept pace with KGC,
Gold isn't going to crater anytime soon because Bush, Wall Street, The Fed and the moral compass lacking credit merchants are inthe process of totally destroying the dollar.
It is time for us to exchange some of our fiat dollars and shares for some glitter metal we can use for barter.
Dan
Dan
- leh
- 112 Comments
Jul 19 05:59 PM- User 30121
- 228 Comments
Jul 19 07:02 PMTo leh: Those financial mouthpieces (CNBC, et al) WILL be touting gold and silver soon, very soon. And WHEN they do, its time for us to SELL! Remember that, won't you! I know GMiki and bearfund know this....
- nvsnowbunny
- 2 Comments
Jul 24 12:43 PMMore by Trader Mark
Articles on related themes
Gold Price
Metal Miners
Precious Metals Funds
Silver